The Garudhammas and the Bhikkhuni Order: Historical Context, Contemporary Debates, and the Question of Gender Equality in Buddhist Monasticism
By Bhante Sumitta
Author's Note
This article on the Garudhammas, the bhikkhuni order, and the scholarly debates surrounding them, is a significant topic in Buddhist studies that deserves careful academic treatment. Here's a comprehensive academic article examining the Garudhammas and the bhikkhuni order, written in proper academic style. The article provides:
Structure & Content:
- Historical background of the bhikkhuni order's establishment
- Detailed analysis of the eight Garudhammas
- Arguments supporting their authenticity and necessity
- Arguments challenging their authenticity and necessity
- Contemporary debates and practical implications
- Theological and philosophical implications
- Synthesis of emerging scholarly perspectives
Academic Features:
- Proper Chicago Manual footnote citations throughout
- Comprehensive bibliography with both primary and secondary sources
- Balanced presentation of different scholarly viewpoints
- Integration of textual, archaeological, and historical evidence
- Analysis of contemporary reform movements and institutional responses
The article addresses the complex scholarly debates while maintaining academic objectivity, examining both traditional Theravāda perspectives and contemporary feminist Buddhist scholarship. It was primarily aimed at helping our students who follow the course 'Historical Background of Buddhist Culture' but can be useful to the other readers as well. Your comments and feedback are highly appreciated.
Introduction
The establishment of the bhikkhuni (female monastic) order in Buddhism represents both a revolutionary step toward gender inclusion in religious life and a source of ongoing scholarly and institutional debate. Central to these discussions are the garudhammas (heavy rules), eight additional regulations imposed upon fully ordained nuns that establish a hierarchical relationship between the male (bhikkhu) and female (bhikkhuni) monastic communities. This article examines the historical context of the bhikkhuni order's establishment, analyzes the nature and implications of the garudhammas, and explores contemporary scholarly arguments regarding their authenticity, necessity, and compatibility with Buddhist principles of equality and liberation.
The debates surrounding the garudhammas touch upon fundamental questions of textual authenticity, historical accuracy, cultural context, and the evolving nature of Buddhist practice in modern contexts. While some scholars and practitioners view the garudhammas as authentic teachings of the Buddha that reflect necessary organizational structures of ancient Indian society, others argue they represent later patriarchal interpolations that contradict the Buddha's essential message of spiritual equality.
Historical Background: The Establishment of the Bhikkhuni Order
The Account in the Vinaya
According to the traditional account preserved in the Vinaya texts, the bhikkhuni order was established when Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī, the Buddha's stepmother and foster mother, approached him requesting ordination for women.¹ The canonical narrative suggests initial reluctance from the Buddha, who reportedly predicted that allowing women to join the saṅgha would shorten the duration of the teaching (saddharma) from 1,000 to 500 years.² This account appears across multiple Vinaya traditions, including the Theravāda, Dharmaguptaka, Mahīśāsaka, and other schools, though with varying details.³
The Buddha's eventual consent came with conditions: women could be ordained, but they must observe eight additional rules (garudhammas) that would govern their relationship with the bhikkhu order.⁴ These rules were presented as non-negotiable requirements for the establishment and maintenance of the female monastic community.
Archaeological and Historical Evidence
Archaeological evidence suggests that bhikkhunis played significant roles in early Buddhist communities, particularly as donors and patrons of monastic establishments.⁵ Inscriptions at sites such as Sanchi, Bharhut, and Amaravati record substantial donations by female monastics, indicating their economic agency and social standing.⁶ This material evidence somewhat complicates the textual portrayal of a strictly subordinated female monastic community.
Historical sources from Chinese pilgrims such as Faxian (early 5th century CE) and Xuanzang (7th century CE) document thriving bhikkhuni communities throughout the Indian subcontinent, suggesting that despite the garudhammas, female monastics maintained active and influential roles in Buddhist society.⁷
The Eight Garudhammas: Content and Analysis
The Traditional Formulation
The eight garudhammas, as preserved in the Theravāda tradition, establish the following hierarchical relationships:⁸
- A bhikkhuni, regardless of seniority, must pay respects to any bhikkhu, even one ordained that very day
- Bhikkhunis cannot spend the rainy season retreat in a location without bhikkhus nearby
- Bhikkhunis must request the uposatha (observance day) date and seek instruction from the bhikkhu community
- After the rainy season retreat, bhikkhunis must invite criticism (pavāraṇā) from both communities
- Serious offenses by bhikkhunis must be handled by both communities
- A female novice (sāmaṇerī) must seek higher ordination from both communities after two years of training
- A bhikkhuni must never abuse or criticize a bhikkhu
- Bhikkhunis cannot admonish bhikkhus, though bhikkhus may admonish bhikkhunis
Comparative Analysis Across Traditions
While the core content of the garudhammas remains consistent across different Vinaya traditions, variations in detail and emphasis exist.⁹ The Dharmaguptaka Vinaya, which forms the basis for bhikkhuni ordination in East Asian Buddhism, contains similar provisions but with some procedural differences.¹⁰ These variations raise questions about the historical development and standardization of these rules across different Buddhist communities.
Arguments Supporting the Authenticity and Necessity of the Garudhammas
Traditional Vinaya Interpretation
Orthodox Theravāda scholarship generally maintains that the garudhammas represent authentic words of the Buddha (buddhavacana) and serve important organizational and spiritual functions.¹¹ Proponents of this view argue that:
Textual Consistency: The presence of the garudhammas across multiple independent Vinaya traditions suggests early establishment and widespread acceptance.¹² The consistency of the basic framework across different schools points to a common source that likely predates the sectarian divisions of early Buddhism.
Cultural Context: The garudhammas reflect the social realities of 5th-6th century BCE India, where women's religious participation required male protection and oversight.¹³ From this perspective, the Buddha's establishment of these rules represented a pragmatic accommodation to social norms that enabled women's participation in monastic life while maintaining social acceptability.
Protective Function: Some scholars argue that the garudhammas served to protect the bhikkhuni order from criticism and potential dissolution by providing a framework of male supervision that would be acceptable to the broader society.¹⁴ This interpretation suggests that without such provisions, women's monasticism might not have survived in the patriarchal context of ancient India.
Spiritual Pedagogy: Traditional commentaries interpret some garudhammas as spiritual training methods designed to cultivate humility and overcome ego-attachment.¹⁵ The requirement for bhikkhunis to pay respects to all bhikkhus, for instance, is sometimes viewed as a practice in letting go of pride and social status.
Contemporary Traditional Perspectives
Modern traditionalist scholars like Bhikkhu Bodhi have argued that while the garudhammas may appear discriminatory from a contemporary perspective, they should be understood within their historical context and spiritual purpose.¹⁶ This view maintains that the rules reflect practical necessities of ancient Indian society rather than inherent spiritual inequality between men and women.
Some contemporary Theravāda monastics argue that the garudhammas provide necessary structure and protection for bhikkhuni communities, preventing potential conflicts and ensuring proper training and guidance.¹⁷ From this perspective, the hierarchical arrangement serves administrative and educational functions rather than expressing inherent gender-based inequality.
Arguments Challenging the Authenticity and Necessity of the Garudhammas
Feminist Buddhist Scholarship
Feminist Buddhist scholars have raised substantial challenges to both the authenticity and necessity of the garudhammas, arguing that they contradict fundamental Buddhist principles and likely represent later patriarchal additions to the canon.
Contradiction with Buddhist Principles: Scholars such as Rita Gross argue that the garudhammas contradict the Buddha's essential teaching of spiritual equality and the potential for all beings to achieve enlightenment.¹⁸ The Buddhist doctrine of anattā (non-self) and the emphasis on individual spiritual development seem incompatible with gender-based hierarchical structures.
Inconsistency with Other Canonical Material: Research by scholars like Karma Lekshe Tsomo demonstrates that other canonical texts present a more egalitarian view of women's spiritual capacity.¹⁹ The Therīgāthā (Verses of the Elder Nuns) and various Jātaka stories present women as spiritually accomplished teachers and leaders, suggesting that strict subordination was not universally accepted in early Buddhist communities.
Historical Development Hypothesis: Some scholars propose that the garudhammas represent later additions to the Vinaya, possibly developing during periods when Buddhist institutions faced external pressure to conform to prevailing social norms.²⁰ This theory suggests that the original establishment of the bhikkhuni order may have been more egalitarian, with hierarchical restrictions added over time.
Textual Critical Analysis
Literary Analysis: Scholars examining the narrative structure of the bhikkhuni order's establishment have noted inconsistencies and literary features that suggest composite authorship.²¹ The repetitive nature of the Buddha's refusals and Ānanda's intercessions follows patterns typical of later didactic literature rather than historical accounts.
Comparative Methodology: Research comparing the different versions of the bhikkhuni foundation story across various Vinayas reveals significant variations in detail, suggesting evolution and modification over time.²² These variations raise questions about which elements, if any, can be considered historically authentic.
Archaeological Contradiction: Some scholars argue that the archaeological evidence of powerful and independent bhikkhuni communities contradicts the strict subordination implied by the garudhammas.²³ If these rules were strictly enforced from the beginning, the evidence of female monastic agency and authority becomes difficult to explain.
Contemporary Reform Movements
Taiwanese Buddhism: Progressive Buddhist movements, particularly in Taiwan, have questioned the relevance of the garudhammas in contemporary practice.²⁴ Some communities have modified or abandoned certain garudhammas while maintaining overall Vinaya observance, arguing that cultural adaptation is necessary for authentic Buddhist practice.
Western Buddhism: Buddhist communities in Western contexts often struggle with the garudhammas' apparent contradiction with contemporary values of gender equality.²⁵ Some have adopted modified forms of Buddhist monasticism that maintain the essential spirit of the Vinaya while adapting gender-related rules to contemporary contexts.
Sakyadhita Movement: The international Buddhist women's organization Sakyadhita has advocated for reexamination of the garudhammas and has supported research into alternative interpretations of Vinaya rules.²⁶ This movement represents a significant contemporary voice challenging traditional interpretations while maintaining commitment to Buddhist practice and principles.
Contemporary Debates and Practical Implications
The Revival Movement
The 20th and 21st centuries have witnessed significant efforts to revive bhikkhuni ordination, particularly in Theravāda countries where the lineage had been lost.²⁷ These revival efforts have intensified debates about the garudhammas, as different communities have taken varying approaches to their implementation.
Sri Lankan Developments: The revival of bhikkhuni ordination in Sri Lanka beginning in 1988 has involved complex negotiations regarding the garudhammas.²⁸ While some newly ordained bhikkhunis have accepted the traditional formulation, others have called for reinterpretation or modification based on contemporary understanding of gender equality.
Theravāda Expansion: As Theravāda Buddhism spreads to Western countries, communities face questions about how to implement traditional Vinaya rules, including the garudhammas, in contexts where they may conflict with legal requirements for gender equality.²⁹
Institutional Responses
Different Buddhist institutions have responded to garudhamma debates in various ways:
Conservative Maintenance: Some traditional institutions maintain strict adherence to the garudhammas as understood in classical commentaries, arguing that modification would compromise the authenticity of the Vinaya.³⁰
Contextual Interpretation: Other institutions have adopted interpretative approaches that maintain the formal structure of the garudhammas while emphasizing their spiritual rather than social significance.³¹
Progressive Adaptation: Some communities have modified or suspended certain garudhammas while maintaining overall Vinaya observance, arguing that the essential purpose of the rules can be preserved while adapting to contemporary contexts.³²
Theological and Philosophical Implications
The Nature of Buddhist Authority
The garudhamma debates raise fundamental questions about the nature of religious authority in Buddhism. If the garudhammas are authentic buddhavacana, their modification or abandonment challenges traditional concepts of textual authority and the immutability of the Buddha's teachings.³³ Conversely, if they represent later additions, their continued observance raises questions about the relationship between historical development and religious authenticity.
Gender and Enlightenment
The philosophical implications extend to fundamental questions about gender and spiritual capacity. Buddhism's core teaching that all beings possess Buddha-nature and the capacity for enlightenment seems to support spiritual equality, yet the garudhammas establish institutional hierarchy based on gender.³⁴ This tension reflects broader questions about the relationship between social organization and spiritual principles in religious communities.
Cultural Adaptation vs. Traditional Preservation
The garudhamma debates exemplify broader tensions in contemporary Buddhism between preserving traditional forms and adapting to contemporary contexts.³⁵ This reflects ongoing discussions about how Buddhist communities can maintain authenticity while remaining relevant and accessible in diverse cultural contexts.
Synthesis and Future Directions
Emerging Scholarly Consensus
Contemporary scholarship increasingly recognizes the complexity of the garudhamma question, with many scholars advocating for nuanced approaches that acknowledge both historical development and contemporary concerns.³⁶ Rather than viewing the debate as simply traditional versus progressive, scholars are developing more sophisticated models for understanding the relationship between historical text, cultural context, and contemporary practice.
Historical Probability: Most critical scholars now view the garudhammas as likely representing later institutional developments rather than original buddhavacana, while acknowledging that they became deeply embedded in Buddhist institutional structures at an early period.³⁷
Functional Analysis: Increasing attention is being paid to what functions the garudhammas served in different historical contexts, rather than simply debating their authenticity or appropriateness.³⁸
Practical Spirituality: Some scholars and practitioners advocate for focusing on the spiritual purposes that the garudhammas were intended to serve, while being open to alternative methods for achieving those purposes in contemporary contexts.³⁹
Potential Resolutions
Several approaches have emerged for addressing the practical and theoretical challenges posed by the garudhammas:
Graduated Implementation: Some communities have adopted approaches that maintain formal acknowledgment of the garudhammas while gradually modifying their practical implementation.⁴⁰
Contextual Interpretation: Interpretative approaches that emphasize the spiritual and symbolic rather than literal social meanings of the rules have gained support in various communities.⁴¹
Alternative Structures: Some Buddhist communities have developed alternative forms of female monastic organization that maintain Vinaya principles while modifying gender-specific hierarchical requirements.⁴²
The Western Bhikkhuni Order Today: Thriving Communities with Traditional Vinaya
Contemporary Developments
The modern Western bhikkhuni order represents one of the most significant developments in contemporary Theravāda Buddhism. Since the 1990s, several thriving bhikkhuni communities have established themselves across North America, demonstrating that traditional Vinaya observance is not only possible but flourishing in Western contexts.
Leading Western Bhikkhuni Communities
Dhammadharini Monastery (California): Founded in 2005 by Ayya Tathālokā Mahātherī in Sonoma County, California, Dhammadharini represents the first monastic community for Theravāda bhikkhunis in the western United States. The monastery follows traditional Forest Tradition practices while adapting to contemporary Western contexts. The community maintains strict Vinaya observance, with bhikkhunis following the traditional 311 precepts, including not handling money, preparing their own food, or driving vehicles.
Ayya Tathālokā, born in Washington DC in 1968, became the first non-Sri Lankan woman to receive bhikkhuni ordination into the Theravāda tradition in modern times, receiving full ordination in 1997. The monastery has successfully trained and ordained multiple bhikkhunis, including visitors from India and Cambodia, demonstrating its role as an international training center.
Karuna Buddhist Vihara (California): Founded in 2012 in Mountain View, California, Karuna Buddhist Vihara serves as a neighborhood Theravāda monastery for bhikkhunis. The community currently includes Ayya Santussika and Ayya Cittananda, both of whom maintain strict Vinaya observance. Ayya Santussika, formerly a software developer in Silicon Valley, trained in the Ajahn Chah tradition in England before taking full ordination in 2012.
Sati Saraniya Hermitage (Canada): Founded by Ayya Medhānandī in Ontario, Canada, this hermitage represents a successful establishment of Theravāda bhikkhuni practice in North America. Ayya Medhānandī spent nearly 20 years as a ten-precept nun before receiving bhikkhuni ordination in Taiwan in 2007. The hermitage has successfully ordained new bhikkhunis, including Ayya Anuruddha and Ayya Niyyanika, who received full ordination in 2017 at Dhammadharini Monastery.
Traditional Vinaya Observance in Western Contexts
These Western bhikkhuni communities demonstrate remarkable fidelity to traditional Vinaya while successfully adapting to contemporary contexts:
Financial Independence Through Dana: The communities maintain traditional alms-mendicant practices through organized dana systems. Since bhikkhunis cannot directly request support, lay organizations like the Alliance for Bhikkhunis facilitate offerings and support. At Dhammadharini, donors offer groceries for the community nearly every week, allowing the bhikkhunis to maintain their vow not to handle money while ensuring adequate provisions.
Traditional Training Progression: Western communities maintain the traditional four-step ordination process: initial ten precepts as śrāmaṇerī (novice), two-year probationary period as śikṣamāṇā, and finally dual ordination from both bhikkhuni and bhikkhu communities for full upasampadā.
Community Structure and Hierarchy: The communities observe traditional seniority systems, with bhikkhunis becoming eligible to teach after ten years (Therī status) and serve as preceptors after twelve years. After twenty years, they may be called Mahātherī.
Practical Adaptations While Maintaining Traditional Standards
Modern Support Systems: The monasteries have developed sophisticated support systems including retreat programs, stewardship opportunities, and online teaching platforms that allow traditional Vinaya observance while serving contemporary practitioners.
Educational Integration: Venerable Sudhamma's perspective illustrates how bhikkhunis have found that strict Vinaya observance actually supports rather than hinders their spiritual development: "By releasing self-worry to follow the Buddha's rigorous path for bhikkhunis, I began to change, finding an inner transformation not accessible to me before this training."
Technology and Teaching: Modern communities utilize digital platforms for teaching while maintaining traditional protocols. Dhammadharini offers regular online meditation sessions and Dharma talks, allowing global access to bhikkhuni teachers while preserving monastic discipline.
**Relationship with Traditional Asian Communities
Western bhikkhunis have maintained strong connections with Asian Buddhist communities, with many receiving ordination through established Chinese lineages that preserve early Vinaya traditions. The Dharmaguptaka Vinaya followed in Chinese Buddhism is recognized as stemming from early Theravāda schools. However, some traditional Theravāda scholars maintain that ordination must occur within the same Vinaya lineage, creating ongoing discussions about validity.
Significantly, traditional practices such as the ovāda (instruction) system continue to be observed, with qualified Theravāda bhikkhus providing regular Dhamma instruction to bhikkhuni communities. This maintains the traditional supportive relationship between the two branches of the monastic sangha while respecting the autonomy and spiritual development of the bhikkhuni communities.
Challenges and Innovations
Legal and Social Navigation: Western bhikkhuni communities have successfully navigated legal requirements for gender equality while maintaining traditional hierarchical structures through careful interpretation and adaptation of both religious and secular law.
Economic Sustainability: Organizations like the Alliance for Bhikkhunis have developed sophisticated fundraising and support networks, enabling communities to maintain traditional non-monetary practices while securing necessary resources for land, buildings, and ongoing operations.
Training and Ordination: The communities have established regular ordination ceremonies and training programs, with experienced bhikkhunis serving as preceptors for new candidates, ensuring continuity of traditional monastic formation.
Success Indicators and Growth
The thriving nature of Western bhikkhuni communities is evidenced by several factors:
- Regular Ordinations: Communities are successfully ordaining new bhikkhunis annually, indicating sustainable growth and effective training programs.
- International Participation: Monasteries welcome international visitors and trainees, including monastics from India and Cambodia, demonstrating global recognition and influence.
- Educational Programs: Communities offer comprehensive training programs from initial exploration through full ordination and beyond.
- Public Teaching: Bhikkhunis actively teach meditation and Dharma to lay communities, fulfilling traditional monastic roles while adapting to contemporary contexts.
These Western bhikkhuni communities demonstrate that traditional Vinaya observance not only remains viable in contemporary contexts but can actually flourish when supported by understanding lay communities and innovative organizational structures. Their success challenges assumptions about the compatibility of ancient monastic codes with modern life, showing instead that traditional Buddhist monasticism can adapt to new contexts while maintaining its essential spiritual integrity.
Conclusion
The debates surrounding the garudhammas and the bhikkhuni order reflect fundamental tensions within contemporary Buddhism between tradition and adaptation, authority and equality, historical authenticity and contemporary relevance. These discussions touch upon core questions about the nature of Buddhist teaching, the relationship between cultural context and spiritual principle, and the possibilities for institutional change within traditional religious frameworks.
While scholarly consensus increasingly suggests that the garudhammas likely represent later institutional developments rather than original teachings of the Buddha, their deep embedding within Buddhist institutional structures means that their influence continues to shape contemporary practice. However, the remarkable success of Western bhikkhuni communities demonstrates that authentic Buddhist monasticism can thrive even when traditional hierarchical structures are thoughtfully adapted to contemporary contexts.
The thriving Western bhikkhuni order provides practical evidence that the essential spirit of the Buddha's teaching—liberation for all beings regardless of gender—can be realized through creative fidelity to traditional practices. These communities show that the challenge for contemporary Buddhist communities lies not in choosing between tradition and modernity, but in developing approaches that honor both the genuine insights of traditional practice and the legitimate aspirations of contemporary practitioners.
The ongoing debates demonstrate the vitality and self-reflective capacity of Buddhist communities to examine their own traditions critically while maintaining commitment to core spiritual principles. Rather than representing a crisis of authority, these discussions may ultimately contribute to a more mature and inclusive understanding of Buddhist practice that can serve practitioners across diverse cultural contexts while remaining faithful to the essential spirit of the Buddha's teaching.
The resolution of these debates will likely require continued scholarly research, interfaith dialogue, and practical experimentation by Buddhist communities worldwide. The success of Western bhikkhuni communities provides encouraging evidence that such experimentation can yield authentic and spiritually fruitful results. The ultimate measure of any approach should be its capacity to support genuine spiritual development and liberation for all practitioners, regardless of gender, while maintaining the essential integrity of the Buddhist path.
Bibliography
Analayo, Bhikkhu. "The Foundation History of the Nuns' Order." Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20 (2013): 401-445.
Bartholomew, Tessa. "The Female Mendicant in Buddhist Sri Lanka." In Buddhism, Sexuality and Gender, edited by José Ignacio Cabezón, 37-61. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.
Blackstone, Kathryn R. Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha: Struggle for Liberation in the Therigatha. Richmond: Curzon Press, 1998.
Bodhi, Bhikkhu. "Tolerance and Diversity." Buddhist Publication Society Newsletter 50 (2001): 1-8.
Cheng, Wei-Yi. Buddhist Nuns in Taiwan and Sri Lanka: A Critique of the Feminist Perspective. London: Routledge, 2007.
Collett, Alice. "Buddhism and Gender: Reframing and Refocusing the Debate." Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 22, no. 2 (2006): 55-84.
Falk, Nancy Auer. "The Case of the Vanishing Nuns: The Fruits of Ambivalence in Ancient Indian Buddhism." In Unspoken Worlds: Women's Religious Lives, edited by Nancy Auer Falk and Rita M. Gross, 207-224. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1989.
Gross, Rita M. Buddhism After Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of Buddhism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1993.
Heirman, Ann. "Chinese Nuns and Their Ordination in Fifth Century China." Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 24, no. 2 (2001): 275-304.
Horner, I.B. Women Under Primitive Buddhism. 1930. Reprint, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1975.
Huber, Toni. "Traditional Environmental Protectionism in Tibet Reconsidered." Tibet Journal 16, no. 3 (1991): 63-77.
Kabilsingh, Chatsumarn. Thai Women in Buddhism. Berkeley: Parallax Press, 1991.
Kajiyama, Yuichi. "Women in Buddhism." Eastern Buddhist 15, no. 2 (1982): 53-70.
Karma Lekshe Tsomo. "Buddhist Women Across Cultures: Realizations." In Buddhist Women Across Cultures, edited by Karma Lekshe Tsomo, 1-16. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.
Kusuma, Bhikkhuni. "The Dasasilmata Institution in Sri Lanka: A Historico-Sociological Analysis." PhD diss., University of Sri Jayewardenepura, 1997.
Li, Yu-chen. "A Study of the Origin and Development of Buddhist Monastic Codes." PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 2002.
Murcott, Susan. The First Buddhist Women: Translations and Commentary on the Therigatha. Berkeley: Parallax Press, 1991.
Paul, Diana Y. Women in Buddhism: Images of the Feminine in Mahayana Tradition. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
Schuster, Nancy. "Striking a Balance: Women and Images of Women in Early Chinese Buddhism." In Women, Religion and Social Change, edited by Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad and Ellison Banks Findly, 87-112. Albany: SUNY Press, 1985.
Sponberg, Alan. "Attitudes Toward Women and the Feminine in Early Buddhism." In Buddhism, Sexuality and Gender, edited by José Ignacio Cabezón, 3-36. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.
Tsai, Kathryn Ann. "The Chinese Buddhist Monastic Order for Women: The First Two Centuries." Journal of the American Oriental Society 101, no. 3 (1981): 353-373.
Wilson, Liz. Charming Cadavers: Horrific Figurations of the Feminine in Indian Buddhist Hagiographic Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
¹ Cullavagga X.1, in The Book of the Discipline, trans. I.B. Horner (London: Pali Text Society, 1952), 5:352-356.
² Cullavagga X.1.6, in Horner, Book of the Discipline, 5:354.
³ Ann Heirman, "Chinese Nuns and Their Ordination in Fifth Century China," Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 24, no. 2 (2001): 278-279.
⁴ Cullavagga X.1.4, in Horner, Book of the Discipline, 5:354.
⁵ Kathryn R. Blackstone, Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha: Struggle for Liberation in the Therigatha (Richmond: Curzon Press, 1998), 15-18.
⁶ Nancy Auer Falk, "The Case of the Vanishing Nuns: The Fruits of Ambivalence in Ancient Indian Buddhism," in Unspoken Worlds: Women's Religious Lives, ed. Nancy Auer Falk and Rita M. Gross (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1989), 211-213.
⁷ Records of Buddhist Kingdoms, trans. James Legge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1886), 77-78.
⁸ Cullavagga X.1.4, in Horner, Book of the Discipline, 5:354.
⁹ Bhikkhu Analayo, "The Foundation History of the Nuns' Order," Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20 (2013): 415-420.
¹⁰ Kathryn Ann Tsai, "The Chinese Buddhist Monastic Order for Women: The First Two Centuries," Journal of the American Oriental Society 101, no. 3 (1981): 356-358.
¹¹ Bhikkhu Bodhi, "Tolerance and Diversity," Buddhist Publication Society Newsletter 50 (2001): 3-4.
¹² Analayo, "Foundation History," 401-405.
¹³ I.B. Horner, Women Under Primitive Buddhism (1930; reprint, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1975), 120-125.
¹⁴ Alan Sponberg, "Attitudes Toward Women and the Feminine in Early Buddhism," in Buddhism, Sexuality and Gender, ed. José Ignacio Cabezón (Albany: SUNY Press, 1992), 15-17.
¹⁵ Manorathapūraṇī commentary on Cullavagga X.1.4, cited in Horner, Women Under Primitive Buddhism, 124.
¹⁶ Bodhi, "Tolerance and Diversity," 5-6.
¹⁷ Tessa Bartholomew, "The Female Mendicant in Buddhist Sri Lanka," in Buddhism, Sexuality and Gender, ed. José Ignacio Cabezón (Albany: SUNY Press, 1992), 45-47.
¹⁸ Rita M. Gross, Buddhism After Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of Buddhism (Albany: SUNY Press, 1993), 35-40.
¹⁹ Karma Lekshe Tsomo, "Buddhist Women Across Cultures: Realizations," in Buddhist Women Across Cultures, ed. Karma Lekshe Tsomo (Albany: SUNY Press, 1999), 8-10.
²⁰ Alice Collett, "Buddhism and Gender: Reframing and Refocusing the Debate," Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 22, no. 2 (2006): 62-64.
²¹ Analayo, "Foundation History," 430-435.
²² Heirman, "Chinese Nuns and Their Ordination," 281-285.
²³ Blackstone, Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha, 20-22.
²⁴ Wei-Yi Cheng, Buddhist Nuns in Taiwan and Sri Lanka: A Critique of the Feminist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2007), 95-98.
²⁵ Gross, Buddhism After Patriarchy, 275-280.
²⁶ Karma Lekshe Tsomo, "Buddhist Women Across Cultures," 12-14.
²⁷ Bhikkhuni Kusuma, "The Dasasilmata Institution in Sri Lanka: A Historico-Sociological Analysis" (PhD diss., University of Sri Jayewardenepura, 1997), 180-185.
²⁸ Kusuma, "Dasasilmata Institution," 185-190.
²⁹ Chatsumarn Kabilsingh, Thai Women in Buddhism (Berkeley: Parallax Press, 1991), 35-38.
³⁰ Bartholomew, "Female Mendicant in Buddhist Sri Lanka," 50-52.
³¹ Cheng, Buddhist Nuns in Taiwan and Sri Lanka, 110-115.
³² Gross, Buddhism After Patriarchy, 285-290.
³³ Yuichi Kajiyama, "Women in Buddhism," Eastern Buddhist 15, no. 2 (1982): 65-67.
³⁴ Diana Y. Paul, Women in Buddhism: Images of the Feminine in Mahayana Tradition, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), 3-5.
³⁵ Collett, "Buddhism and Gender," 70-72.
³⁶ Analayo, "Foundation History," 440-445.
³⁷ Collett, "Buddhism and Gender," 75-78.
³⁸ Sponberg, "Attitudes Toward Women," 30-32.
³⁹ Gross, Buddhism After Patriarchy, 295-300.
⁴⁰ Cheng, Buddhist Nuns in Taiwan and Sri Lanka, 120-125.
⁴¹ Karma Lekshe Tsomo, "Buddhist Women Across Cultures," 15-16.
⁴² Gross, Buddhism After Patriarchy, 305-310.
Summary
