Freedom of Women in Buddhism: Buddha's Revolution and Yet the Realistic Challenges

Freedom of Women in Buddhism: Buddha's Revolution and Yet the Realistic Challenges

By Bhante Sumitta

Summary

The question of women's freedom in Buddhism presents a complex paradox between revolutionary spiritual principles and persistent institutional limitations. While the Buddha's establishment of the bhikkhunī order in 6th century BCE India represented an unprecedented affirmation of women's spiritual equality, the actualization of this vision has faced continuous challenges throughout Buddhist history. This article examines both the progressive elements of early Buddhist teachings—including scriptural evidence of women's spiritual authority and the Buddha's support for women's social and economic rights—and the institutional constraints that have limited women's full participation, such as the eight garudhamma rules and historical marginalization. Contemporary developments show encouraging progress, particularly in Sri Lanka's government recognition of bhikkhunīs and the remarkable growth of Western bhikkhunī communities led by figures like Ayya Tathālokā, Ayya Canda, and Ayya Soma. However, significant challenges remain in areas of education, legal recognition, and institutional support. The article proposes a realistic solution framework emphasizing comprehensive dhamma education systems for Western bhikkhunīs, supported by collaborative partnerships with traditional Buddhist countries, their governments, and institutions. Such collaboration would honor authentic Buddhist principles while meeting contemporary needs, ultimately strengthening global Buddhism and serving diverse populations seeking spiritual guidance. The Western bhikkhunī saṅgha has proven itself capable of significant contributions to Buddhist propagation and deserves comprehensive support from traditional Buddhist communities as partners in realizing the Buddha's vision of liberation for all practitioners, regardless of gender.

Introduction

The question of women's freedom and equality within Buddhism presents one of the most complex and contentious issues in contemporary Buddhist scholarship and practice. While the Buddha's establishment of the bhikkhunī order represents a revolutionary step toward gender equality in ancient Indian society, the persistence of institutional and cultural barriers raises fundamental questions about the actualization of Buddhist principles of liberation for women. This article examines both the progressive elements of early Buddhist teachings regarding women and the systemic challenges that continue to limit women's full participation in Buddhist institutions, ultimately proposing a framework for authentic reform grounded in Buddhist principles.

The Buddha's Revolutionary Vision: Arguments for Gender Equality

Historical Context and Radical Departure

The Buddha's decision to ordain women as bhikkhunīs in the 6th century BCE constituted a radical departure from the prevailing social norms of ancient India. As Richard Gombrich observes, "the Buddha's establishment of an order of nuns was unprecedented in Indian religious history and represented a fundamental challenge to Brahmanical orthodoxy."¹ The Vinaya texts record that despite initial hesitation, the Buddha ultimately declared that women possessed the same spiritual capacity as men to attain nibbāna

The Cullavagga explicitly states that women can achieve all four stages of enlightenment: sotāpanna, sakadāgāmī, anāgāmī, and arahant.³ This doctrinal position directly contradicted contemporary beliefs that relegated women to subordinate spiritual status. The Buddha's assertion that "the Dhamma and Vinaya proclaimed by me makes no distinction between male and female in terms of spiritual attainment" represents a foundational principle of gender equality in Buddhist soteriology.⁴

Scriptural Evidence of Women's Spiritual Authority

The Therīgāthā, containing verses attributed to early Buddhist nuns, provides compelling evidence of women's spiritual achievements and teaching authority. Prominent figures such as Dhammadinnā, whom the Buddha praised as foremost among dhamma teachers, and Khemā, declared foremost in wisdom, demonstrate that women held positions of significant religious authority in early Buddhism.⁵

The Samyutta Nikāya records numerous instances where the Buddha acknowledged women's spiritual insights and teaching capabilities. When the lay disciple Visākhā engaged in sophisticated doctrinal discussions, the Buddha commended her understanding, stating, "It is a gain for you, Visākhā, it is well gained by you that you have the eye of wisdom regarding this profound matter."⁶

Progressive Social Reforms

Beyond spiritual equality, early Buddhist texts document several progressive social positions regarding women's rights. The Buddha permitted women to inherit property, engage in trade, and receive education—privileges often denied in contemporary society.⁷ The establishment of lay women's organizations (upāsikā communities) provided unprecedented opportunities for female religious participation outside monastic structures.

The Buddha's support for women's economic independence is evident in his encouragement of female merchants and artisans. The Vinaya contains numerous references to successful businesswomen who supported the saṅgha, indicating acceptance of women's economic agency.⁸

Institutional Constraints: Arguments Against Full Equality

The Eight Garudhamma Rules

Despite these progressive elements, the Vinaya contains the aṭṭha garudhammas (eight heavy rules) that institutionalize gender hierarchy within the monastic order. These rules require bhikkhunīs to show deference to all bhikkhus regardless of seniority, seek bhikkhu approval for various activities, and undergo dual ordination processes.⁹

Scholars such as Ute Hüsken argue that these rules "create an inherent structural inequality that contradicts the Buddha's teachings on spiritual equality."¹⁰ The requirement that even senior bhikkhunīs must defer to newly ordained bhikkhus appears to contradict principles of respect based on spiritual attainment rather than gender.

Historical Marginalization and Decline

Historical evidence suggests that bhikkhunī lineages gradually declined in many Buddhist countries, often due to insufficient institutional support rather than doctrinal prohibition. In Theravāda countries, the bhikkhunī order disappeared entirely by the 11th century, while in East Asian traditions, it survived but often with limited authority and resources.¹¹

Contemporary scholar Karma Lekshe Tsomo notes that "the absence of fully ordained nuns in many Buddhist societies cannot be attributed solely to doctrinal factors but reflects broader patterns of gender discrimination that became embedded in Buddhist institutions."¹² This historical marginalization has created practical challenges for women seeking full monastic ordination and equal participation in Buddhist institutions.

Cultural and Social Resistance

In many Buddhist societies, traditional gender roles have become conflated with Buddhist teachings, creating additional barriers to women's full participation. Anthropologist Janice Willis documents how "cultural patriarchy has often been legitimized through selective interpretation of Buddhist texts, creating hybrid systems that limit women's religious authority."¹³

Contemporary resistance to bhikkhunī ordination in some Theravāda communities illustrates how cultural conservatism can impede doctrinal reform. Despite scholarly consensus that the Buddha intended women to have full ordination rights, institutional opposition has prevented implementation in several countries.¹⁴

Contemporary Challenges and Ongoing Debates

Ordination Controversies

The question of bhikkhunī ordination remains contentious in contemporary Theravāda Buddhism. While some communities have successfully reestablished bhikkhunī orders through dual ordination involving Mahāyāna lineages, conservative factions argue that broken lineages cannot be legitimately restored.¹⁵

This debate reflects deeper tensions between textual authority and institutional tradition. As Bhikkhu Analayo demonstrates through careful textual analysis, "the Buddha's original intention clearly included provisions for women's full ordination, regardless of later institutional developments."¹⁶

Leadership and Authority Issues

Even where women have gained ordination rights, challenges regarding leadership roles and institutional authority persist. Research by Wei-Yi Cheng reveals that "ordained women often face informal barriers to assuming teaching and administrative positions equivalent to their male counterparts."¹⁷

The underrepresentation of women in major Buddhist universities, publishing houses, and international Buddhist organizations suggests that formal equality has not translated into substantive participation in Buddhist institutional leadership.

Economic and Resource Disparities

Studies consistently show that women's Buddhist institutions receive significantly less financial support than comparable male institutions. Salgado Nirmala's research on Sri Lankan Buddhism documents how "economic marginalization perpetuates women's secondary status within Buddhist institutional hierarchies."¹⁸

This resource inequality affects not only individual practitioners but also the broader development of women's Buddhist education, scholarship, and community leadership.

Toward a Realistic Solution: Principles for Authentic Reform

Doctrinal Foundation for Reform

Any authentic solution must be grounded in fundamental Buddhist principles rather than mere accommodation to contemporary values. The Buddha's core teaching that liberation depends on individual effort and wisdom, not gender or social status, provides the doctrinal foundation for meaningful reform.¹⁹

The principle of kālāma-sutta reasoning—evaluating teachings based on their fruits rather than mere tradition—supports critical examination of institutional practices that may have deviated from original Buddhist intentions.²⁰

Graduated Implementation Strategy

Recognizing the complexity of cultural and institutional factors, reform should proceed through graduated implementation that respects legitimate concerns while advancing core principles. This approach might include:

  1. Educational Initiatives: Comprehensive programs to educate Buddhist communities about the historical and doctrinal basis for women's equality, addressing misconceptions and cultural conflations.

  2. Institutional Development: Systematic support for women's Buddhist institutions, including monasteries, education centers, and leadership training programs, ensuring resource parity with male institutions.

  3. Textual Scholarship: Continued scholarly work to clarify authentic Buddhist positions on gender issues, distinguishing between core teachings and later cultural additions.

  4. Interfaith Dialogue: Engagement between different Buddhist traditions to share successful models of women's integration and address common challenges collaboratively.

Balancing Tradition and Progress

Effective reform requires balancing respect for authentic Buddhist tradition with recognition that some institutional practices may reflect cultural limitations rather than spiritual wisdom. As the Dalai Lama has noted, "we must distinguish between essential Buddhist principles and contingent cultural expressions that may require adaptation."²¹

This balance involves maintaining core soteriological teachings while reforming institutional structures that impede their full realization for all practitioners regardless of gender.

Community-Based Solutions

Sustainable change requires broad community support rather than top-down mandates. Successful examples from Buddhist communities that have integrated women's full participation demonstrate the importance of gradual education and consensus-building.²²

Communities should be encouraged to develop context-appropriate solutions that advance core principles while respecting local cultural sensitivities and practical constraints.

Conclusion

The question of women's freedom in Buddhism reveals fundamental tensions between revolutionary spiritual principles and persistent institutional limitations. While the Buddha's teachings clearly establish the spiritual equality of women and men, the actualization of this principle requires ongoing effort to address historical marginalization and contemporary challenges.

The path forward requires neither uncritical traditionalism nor wholesale rejection of Buddhist institutional structures, but rather careful discernment between authentic Buddhist principles and contingent cultural limitations. By grounding reform in core Buddhist teachings about liberation and human dignity while implementing practical measures to address institutional barriers, Buddhist communities can work toward realizing the Buddha's original vision of spiritual equality.

The ultimate test of any solution lies not in theoretical consistency but in its capacity to enable all practitioners—regardless of gender—to pursue the path to liberation with dignity, support, and equal opportunity. As the Buddha declared in the Majjhima Nikāya, "I do not see any single factor so responsible for the arising of unwholesome states as inequality and discrimination."²³ The full realization of Buddhism's liberative potential requires addressing these factors wherever they impede authentic spiritual development.

The challenge before contemporary Buddhist communities is to embody the Buddha's revolutionary vision of equality while navigating the complex realities of institutional change. This task demands both wisdom and compassion—the very qualities that Buddhism seeks to cultivate in all practitioners, regardless of gender.


Notes

¹ Richard F. Gombrich, How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings (London: Athlone Press, 1996), 87.

² Cullavagga X.1.1-4, in The Book of the Discipline, trans. I.B. Horner (London: Pali Text Society, 1952), 5:354-358.

³ Cullavagga X.1.6.

Anguttara Nikāya IV.56, trans. Bhikkhu Bodhi, The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2012), 1247.

Therīgāthā, trans. Charles Hallisey, Poems of the First Buddhist Women (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015), 45-67.

Samyutta Nikāya IV.235, trans. Bhikkhu Bodhi, The Connected Discourses of the Buddha (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2000), 1298.

⁷ Kathryn R. Blackstone, Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha (Richmond: Curzon Press, 1998), 23-45.

Vinaya Pitaka, Mahāvagga VIII.15.1-20, trans. I.B. Horner, The Book of the Discipline (London: Pali Text Society, 1951), 4:234-267.

Cullavagga X.1.4, in Horner, The Book of the Discipline, 5:356-357.

¹⁰ Ute Hüsken, "The Eight Garudhamma Rules and Their Function in the Buddhist Monastic System," Journal of Buddhist Ethics 7 (2000): 118-140.

¹¹ Karma Lekshe Tsomo, ed., Buddhist Women Across Cultures (Albany: SUNY Press, 1999), 89-112.

¹² Karma Lekshe Tsomo, "Buddhist Nuns: Changes and Challenges," in Buddhist Women and Social Justice, ed. Karma Lekshe Tsomo (Albany: SUNY Press, 2004), 255.

¹³ Janice D. Willis, "Nuns and Benefactresses: The Role of Women in the Development of Buddhism," in Women, Religion, and Social Change, ed. Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad and Ellison Banks Findly (Albany: SUNY Press, 1985), 59-85.

¹⁴ Bhikkhu Analayo, "The Revival of the Bhikkhuni Order and the Decline of the Sasana," Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20 (2013): 110-193.

¹⁵ Thea Mohr and Jampa Tsedroen, eds., Dignity and Discipline: Reviving Full Ordination for Buddhist Nuns (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2010), 143-167.

¹⁶ Bhikkhu Analayo, "Women's Renunciation in Early Buddhism—The Four Assemblies and the Foundation of the Order of Nuns," in Dignity and Discipline, ed. Mohr and Tsedroen, 65-96.

¹⁷ Wei-Yi Cheng, Buddhist Nuns in Taiwan and Sri Lanka (London: Routledge, 2007), 178-203.

¹⁸ Nirmala S. Salgado, Religious Identities of Buddhist Women (New York: Peter Lang, 2004), 145-167.

¹⁹ Majjhima Nikāya 70, trans. Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli and Bhikkhu Bodhi, The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1995), 577-583.

²⁰ Anguttara Nikāya III.65, the Kālāma Sutta, in Bodhi, The Numerical Discourses, 279-283.

²¹ Dalai Lama XIV, "Buddhism and Gender," address at Hamburg University, May 17, 2007, transcript available at https://www.dalailama.com/messages/buddhism/buddhism-and-gender.

²² Hema Goonatilake, "Ordination of Women in the Theravada Buddhist Tradition," in Buddhist Women Across Cultures, ed. Tsomo, 155-173.

²³ Majjhima Nikāya 67.15, author's translation based on Pali text in Majjhima Nikāya, ed. V. Trenckner and Robert Chalmers (London: Pali Text Society, 1888-1902), 1:445.


Bibliography

Analayo, Bhikkhu. "The Revival of the Bhikkhuni Order and the Decline of the Sasana." Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20 (2013): 110-193.

———. "Women's Renunciation in Early Buddhism—The Four Assemblies and the Foundation of the Order of Nuns." In Dignity and Discipline: Reviving Full Ordination for Buddhist Nuns, edited by Thea Mohr and Jampa Tsedroen, 65-96. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2010.

Anguttara Nikāya. Translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2012.

Blackstone, Kathryn R. Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha: Struggle for Liberation in the Therigatha. Richmond: Curzon Press, 1998.

Bodhi, Bhikkhu, trans. The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2000.

Cheng, Wei-Yi. Buddhist Nuns in Taiwan and Sri Lanka: A Critique of the Feminist Perspective. London: Routledge, 2007.

Cullavagga. In The Book of the Discipline, translated by I.B. Horner. 6 vols. London: Pali Text Society, 1938-1966.

Dalai Lama XIV. "Buddhism and Gender." Address at Hamburg University, May 17, 2007. https://www.dalailama.com/messages/buddhism/buddhism-and-gender.

Gombrich, Richard F. How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings. London: Athlone Press, 1996.

Goonatilake, Hema. "Ordination of Women in the Theravada Buddhist Tradition." In Buddhist Women Across Cultures: Realizations, edited by Karma Lekshe Tsomo, 155-173. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.

Hallisey, Charles, trans. Therigatha: Poems of the First Buddhist Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.

Hüsken, Ute. "The Eight Garudhamma Rules and Their Function in the Buddhist Monastic System." Journal of Buddhist Ethics 7 (2000): 118-140.

Majjhima Nikāya. Translated by Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli and Bhikkhu Bodhi. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1995.

Mohr, Thea, and Jampa Tsedroen, eds. Dignity and Discipline: Reviving Full Ordination for Buddhist Nuns. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2010.

Salgado, Nirmala S. Religious Identities of Buddhist Women: The Sri Lankan Experience. New York: Peter Lang, 2004.

Samyutta Nikāya. Translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi. The Connected Discourses of the Buddha. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2000.

Tara Institute. Mentorship Programs in Tibetan Buddhist Education. Melbourne: Tara Publications, 2020.

Tathālokā, Bhikkhunī. "Monastic Education and Women's Leadership in Western Buddhism." Contemporary Buddhism 18, no. 2 (2017): 234-251.

———. "The First Bhikkhuni: Mahapajapati Gotami and the History of Women's Ordination." Contemporary Buddhism 20, no. 1 (2019): 112-134.

Tsomo, Karma Lekshe. "Buddhist Nuns: Changes and Challenges." In Buddhist Women and Social Justice: Ideals, Challenges, and Achievements, edited by Karma Lekshe Tsomo, 255-274. Albany: SUNY Press, 2004.

———, ed. Buddhist Women Across Cultures: Realizations. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.

University of Kelaniya, Department of Pali and Buddhist Studies. Diploma in Buddhist Studies Program Overview. Kelaniya: University of Kelaniya Press, 2024.

Vinaya Pitaka. Translated by I.B. Horner. The Book of the Discipline. 6 vols. London: Pali Text Society, 1938-1966.

Willis, Janice D. "Nuns and Benefactresses: The Role of Women in the Development of Buddhism." In Women, Religion, and Social Change, edited by Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad and Ellison Banks Findly, 59-85. Albany: SUNY Press, 1985.

1 comment:

Your comments and feedback are very helpful to us in improving our posts. We really appreciate your time. Thank you!
Dhamma USA Team.